Skip to content
Capilano Courier
Menu
  • Home
  • Sections
    • News
    • Features & The Profile
    • Arts & Culture
    • Letters
    • Humour
    • Video Production
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
  • Meet the Crew
  • Online Issues
  • Events
Menu

CMNS 236 Understanding More Television: The Changing Landscape of TV

Posted on January 22, 2019January 25, 2019 by Carlo Javier

Carlo Javier, Binge-watcher and binge-eater // Illustration by Cynthia Tran Vo

One of my favourite cold opens from The Office is the one where Michael Scott (Steve Carell) emulates Meryl Streep’s menacing portrayal of Miranda Priestly from The Devil Wears Prada. The range of emotions that Michael goes through as he progresses through his incremental viewing of the movie was a sight to behold, but what really gets me during my many retroactive binge-watching sessions of The Office is when Pam Beesly (Jenna Fischer) says:  

“Michael just rented The Devil Wears Prada. He has his Netflix sent here to the office and he watches them in pieces when things are slow.” 

The episode originally aired on Oct. 8, 2007. Netflix existed then, but in an iteration not many youths today might recognize – as a video-on-demand service that physically mailed subscribers DVDs of recommended movies. It was a different time. Using algorithms to predict the type of content that viewers might like hadn’t been thought of yet. Streaming shows was still years away and Netflix was still steps away from its next iteration, which was online DVD rentals.  

Oh, how things have changed. 

I didn’t see The Office until five years after its production ended and like its horde of fans, it’s a show that I rank highly on my list of personal favourites. Yet I do believe that had I been a viewer of The Office during its original run, my relationship with the show wouldn’t be as significant. Netflix and its streaming model was just the perfect way to consume the 22-42 minutes of an Office episode.  

The numbers don’t lie either. Towards the end of 2018, Netflix saw two major news reports regarding their economics. One, they paid upwards of $100 million to keep Friends in their library. Two, The Office continues to be, far and away, the most popular television show on Netflix – amassing over seven per cent of the viewer share, almost doubling the number of the second-place series, Friends. 

It is a great understatement to say that Netflix has disrupted mass media. They developed the algorithm that allowed them to determine the type of shows that viewers want to see. When viewers wanted politics, Netflix came out with House of Cards. Want Game of Thrones and high fantasy, but don’t want to pay the premium prices of HBO? Here’s The Last Kingdom and Marco Polo. Looking for more superheroes? Check out Daredevil or Jessica Jones. 

It’s a fascinating science, especially when considering the other side of the conversation. Netflix Originals is bereft of the shows and sitcoms that dominate primetime television. Law enforcement and police procedurals have steadily phased out, medical dramas still populate major networks, but outside of the lasting power of Grey’s Anatomy and Freddie Highmore’s sheer brilliance in The Good Doctor, these medical shows are essentially cannibalizing one another.  

The future doesn’t look too bright for sitcoms either. Yes, Brooklyn Nine-Nine is admirably carrying the torch and The Good Place is easily the best show on a major network, but the body count for sitcoms that get axed after one season is jarring.  

Netflix works though. The Office proves it, and other sitcoms like New Girl, Arrested Development and How I Met Your Mother all have found renewed success post-production through the streaming model.  

Maybe Marshall McLuhan was indeed right after all. Maybe the medium really is the message. The technology in which our favourite shows are communicated through has effectively changed us – and the entire TV biosphere for that matter. Netflix saw this and adapted to the streaming model while its direct competitors – like Blockbuster – ceased to exist.   

The landscape of television is frequently shifting, and the one constant variable is the viewer. John Fiske wrote that we are agents of culture in process and it would be remiss to study and analyze the state of television without some personal reflection – we are the ones watching these shows after all. That’s exactly what I hope to achieve in this column – to be a conduit for discussions around the ever-evolving culture of TV.  

Category: Columns

Post navigation

← Snow, How About No?
Trying Times: Raising the Barre  →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upcoming Tabling Hours: Thursdays, 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., at either the Learning Commons entrance (LB 126) or Birch Cafeteria.

Latest News

  • The Collateral Damage of Cutting Courses
    As CapU faces financial woes, students are being forced to take required courses elsewhere  Ben Taylor (he/him) // Crew Writer   Jasmine […]
  • Deficit Mitigation Proposals Meet Outdated Policies
    The key policy grey areas impacting Senate’s role in high-stakes decisions Laura Morales Padilla (she/her) // Co-EIC & Ilustrator  The […]
  • CapU Introduces Protest Guidelines
    Capilano University quietly introduces guidelines for protests on campus, emphasizes campus grounds are ‘private property’  Jolee Wen […]
  • CapU Announces the Closure of Sunshine Coast Kálax̱-ay Campus and the ‘not closure’ of CapU Lonsdale
    Administration consolidates two key satellite campuses as financial woes continue  Ren Zhang (they/they)  // Contributor & […]
  • Major Win for CapU Student Workers   
    New Student Employee Union Gets Wage Increase  Mayumi Izumi (she/her) // Contributor Rachel Lu (She/Her) // Illustrator Organizers at […]
  • Orange Pilled
    Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s Bitcoin Obsession   Ben Taylor (He/Him) // Crew Writer   Alex Baidanuta (She/Her) // Illustrator    […]
Video Production
On Monday, January 19th, BC student leaders held a press conference outside the Constituency Office of Jessie Sunner—Minister of Post-Secondary Education & Future Skills and MLA for Surrey-Newton. 

Kevin Root—Chairperson of the Alliance of BC Students, Solomon Yi-Kieran—Vice-President External of the UBC Alma Mater Society, and Jessica Lamb—VP External & Community Affairs of the Simon Fraser Student Society commented on the government's review of the post-secondary education sector and their experience during the "incredibly short" consultation period.

00:00 - Intro
00:18 - What happened on January 19th?
00:52 - Opening remarks by the Chairperson of the ABCS
01:02 - Why the federal cap on international students heavily impacted colleges and universities across the province.
01:47 - The government needs to pay their fair share of the operating costs to keep the system afloat
02:49 - Any changes to the tuition limit policy would be a direct attack on students
03:23 - Demands from students
03:48 - Why is the review dangerous?
04:35 - Is the review a performative act?
05:11 - How would a tuition increase impact students and the province?
07:02 - Key takeaways
PROTECT STUDENTS | BC Students stand together against tuition increases, mergers and dangerous cuts
Subscribe
What even is a Zine? Mia shows us a behind the scene of how this little publication comes together, the vision behind it, and how to become a paid contributor of the C.C. Crumb!
Indigenous power means something different to every student, but it always begins with voice, community, and truth. Hear what CapU students had to say.
What does campus clean-up day look like?
© 2026 Capilano Courier | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme