Skip to content
Capilano Courier
Menu
  • Home
  • Sections
    • News
    • Features & The Profile
    • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Humour
    • Video Production
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
  • Meet the Crew
  • Online Issues
  • Subscribe!
Menu

Reboot? Maybe not

Posted on April 2, 2022April 4, 2022 by Yasmine Elsayed

To reboot or not to reboot, that is the question

Yasmine Elsayed (she/her) // Contributor
Valeriya Kim (she/her) // Illustrator

Recently, reboots became quite famous, and I don’t exactly know why. The remaking of certain shows can really ruin the nostalgia that a lot of people have while watching the originals. The problem with remakes is that writers and producers try to reshape the original story and match it to today’s standards. 90 per cent of the time, the plots are forced and don’t have heart.  With reboots, all they have going for them is the name. Like jumping on a trend, it spreads like wildfire. Everything now has a reboot, for example, Charmed or Gossip Girl.  

I, for one, heavily opposed the remaking of Charmed, a show debuted in 1998 about three sisters, Piper, Phoebe and Prue — finding out they are witches, and thus the story begins. The original cast and plot hold a special place in my heart, and I associate that show with many bonding moments I had with my friends and family while it was first airing. Waiting every Friday night, picking snacks, and getting cozy on the couch was a ritual of ours. The 2018 Charmed has a similar storyline, set design, and love interests, but Charmed should have stayed a stand alone original.

The remake didn’t ruin my memories, but I felt that the classics should just remain that. Classics. I believe that the purpose of the reboots is to attempt to bring something “new” to the audience and relate it to the people who watched the original shows or movies. The 2007 Gossip Girl is a fantastic show but had its share of problems — primarily the problematic romanticism of elite students during a recession.

However, the 2021 Gossip Girl attempts to pick up where the original left off — with a new generation going through the same cycle that the original cast went through. Was this “remake” necessary? Not really. One Gossip Girl show is more than enough. What’s funny about this situation is when you google Gossip Girl or Charmed, the original shows pop-up, not the remakes.

The beauty of having original ideas is that you are introduced to new adventures, new characters, new mysteries, and the list goes on. Re-using these ideas ruins the excitement of it all. However, if new generations want to watch a good show, I would definitely recommend the original series since going “vintage” is a trend right now.

I’ll admit, I have liked a reboot in the past. Granted, I didn’t know it was a remake until recently, but I did get sucked into the 2012 film 21 Jump Street. I found out that it was originally a show made in 1987 with an incredible cast that was a lot more diverse than the film. The film is great but, just as suspected, the original is much better. Looking back with my newfound knowledge of the 1987 show, I have to appreciate that some of the original cast did make an appearance in the 2012 version. 

With reboots, there is a high possibility that you might dislike it. If you weren’t aware that there is an original, like myself, the odds for disliking the show are in your favour. Either way, you can never go right with reboots. Unless it’s 21 Jump Street.

Category: Opinions

Post navigation

← Please, Still Be F**king Kind
Check Your Thrift Store Privilege →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

  • Challenging Colonial and Patriarchal Structures in Academia
    An interview with Dr. Vicki St. Pierre, CapU’s new Provost & Vice-President Academic Written by Asmi Toor Sogi (she/her) // News Writer […]
  • Who Broke the Fall When International Enrolment Collapsed?
    The quiet disappearance of non-regular faculty across the province and the diffusion of responsibility among governments and institutions […]
  • Capilano University Was Not Named After Chief Joe Capilano
    The university has corrected its land acknowledgment amid claims of historical inaccuracy Written by Sara Derksen (they/them) // News […]
  • CapU Library Reduces Operating Hours as University Confronts Deficit
    An interview with Interim University Librarian Sabrina Wong Written by Xiadany Jeanette Lopez Hernandez (she/her) // News Writer Visuals by […]
  • Meet the New Chancellor
    Debra Doucette became the new chancellor of CapU in June 2026. The Courier had the opportunity to interview her about her new role and her […]
  • No AI in Vancouver
    The Fight Against AI data Centres Sara Derksen (they/them) // News Editor Lily Jones (she/her)// Contributing Visuals There is a growing […]
Video Production
On October 3rd, 2026, hundreds of people joined the march organized by No Ai Vancouver—a grassroots movement that was founded to prevent the construction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) data centres in Metro Vancouver. Join Asmi, our news writer, to find out what inspired people to protest.

Read more about the No Ai Movement at capilanocourier.com/2026/10/01/no-ai-in-vancouver/
International Day of Protest Against AI (Vancouver)
Subscribe
What even is a Zine? Mia shows us a behind the scene of how this little publication comes together, the vision behind it, and how to become a paid contributor of the C.C. Crumb!
Indigenous power means something different to every student, but it always begins with voice, community, and truth. Hear what CapU students had to say.
What does campus clean-up day look like?
© 2026 Capilano Courier | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme