Skip to content
Capilano Courier
Menu
  • Home
  • Sections
    • News
    • Features & The Profile
    • Arts & Culture
    • Letters
    • Humour
    • Video Production
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
  • Meet the Crew
  • Online Issues
  • Events
Menu

Separating Art, Controversy and Celebrity

Posted on March 13, 2019March 13, 2019 by Andie Bjornsfelt

Do problematic celebrities like Karl Lagerfeld deserve to be mourned?

Andie Bjornsfelt, Contributor

85-year-old German fashion mogul Karl Lagerfeld passed away on Feb. 19. He worked as the creative director for both Chanel and Fendi. Although Lagerfeld was an amazing fashion icon, he said a lot of problematic things in his life, including in response to the uproar that was the #MeToo movement and how many celebrities have been exposed for their past and present sexual abuses. This brings forward a very relevant question we are all faced with today as a public audience — is it okay to support a person who has done and said shitty things if they’ve created beautiful, iconic works of art? When it comes to Lagerfeld, the concern is whether or not his masterpieces can be celebrated while still acknowledging the things he did wrong. The answer is as complex as the question — yes, but with conditions.

Lagerfeld was an icon because his contribution to the fashion world was so great. His work with Chanel was prolific. He took the brand and made them accessible to the modern audience. He attempted to make his designs more affordable (although they’re still generally unaffordable for most people, but he had good intentions). Last year he had Chanel ban animal skins and furs, making them the first major fashion house to do so. Following in his footsteps, London Fashion Week decided to not use fur in September for the first time.

Some of Lagerfeld’s comments were of a model being “too fat”,  as well as an Islamophobic comment he made when Chancellor Angela Merkel talked about welcoming Syrian refugees into Germany. Additionally, he also expressed criticism against the #MeToo movement.

The opinion of whether it is safe to celebrate Lagerfeld’s life or not is divided. Actor Jameela Jamil wrote on Twitter that he was “a ruthless, fat-phobic misogynist”. On the other hand, model Cara Delevingne, who was both a close friend and model for Lagerfeld, wrote, “He was not a saint, he is human being like all of us who made mistakes and we should all have the chance to be forgiven for that.”

Lagerfeld once said, “Everything I say is a joke, I am a joke myself.” Additionally, Lagerfeld was gay, but was against gay marriage (deeming it to be “bourgeois”). It’s possible that he could have been saying what he really felt in the moment or he could have been stirring up his image for attention.

It is important to remember that Lagerfeld was 85 years old. We are now in an age, with the internet to document everything, where everything we say is kept and taken apart. He grew up in a different time when this wasn’t even the case, though it doesn’t excuse his behaviour. The answer to whether he should be mourned, as mentioned, is complex and requires an attempt to extend an understanding of human nature, even when it can be heartbreaking to do so. The answer is yes, we can celebrate him along with the other artists who have done and said wrong. But these wrongs must be held accountable to the person.

Despite all Lagerfeld’s artistry and creativity, we cannot ignore the comments he made. It would be ignorant to do so. It is important to hold people who are public figures in accountable for their actions. Since celebrities have such power and influence, responsibility comes along with that privilege– even if they do not recognize this power, it is important they use their words with intention and care. We must recognize this, not only with Lagerfeld, but all celebrities.

Category: Opinions

Post navigation

← You Have a New Friend Request
Why Are You Chanting? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upcoming Tabling Hours: Thursdays, 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., at either the Learning Commons entrance (LB 126) or Birch Cafeteria.

Latest News

  • The Collateral Damage of Cutting Courses
    As CapU faces financial woes, students are being forced to take required courses elsewhere  Ben Taylor (he/him) // Crew Writer   Jasmine […]
  • Deficit Mitigation Proposals Meet Outdated Policies
    The key policy grey areas impacting Senate’s role in high-stakes decisions Laura Morales Padilla (she/her) // Co-EIC & Ilustrator  The […]
  • CapU Introduces Protest Guidelines
    Capilano University quietly introduces guidelines for protests on campus, emphasizes campus grounds are ‘private property’  Jolee Wen […]
  • CapU Announces the Closure of Sunshine Coast Kálax̱-ay Campus and the ‘not closure’ of CapU Lonsdale
    Administration consolidates two key satellite campuses as financial woes continue  Ren Zhang (they/they)  // Contributor & […]
  • Major Win for CapU Student Workers   
    New Student Employee Union Gets Wage Increase  Mayumi Izumi (she/her) // Contributor Rachel Lu (She/Her) // Illustrator Organizers at […]
  • Orange Pilled
    Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s Bitcoin Obsession   Ben Taylor (He/Him) // Crew Writer   Alex Baidanuta (She/Her) // Illustrator    […]
Video Production
On Monday, January 19th, BC student leaders held a press conference outside the Constituency Office of Jessie Sunner—Minister of Post-Secondary Education & Future Skills and MLA for Surrey-Newton. 

Kevin Root—Chairperson of the Alliance of BC Students, Solomon Yi-Kieran—Vice-President External of the UBC Alma Mater Society, and Jessica Lamb—VP External & Community Affairs of the Simon Fraser Student Society commented on the government's review of the post-secondary education sector and their experience during the "incredibly short" consultation period.

00:00 - Intro
00:18 - What happened on January 19th?
00:52 - Opening remarks by the Chairperson of the ABCS
01:02 - Why the federal cap on international students heavily impacted colleges and universities across the province.
01:47 - The government needs to pay their fair share of the operating costs to keep the system afloat
02:49 - Any changes to the tuition limit policy would be a direct attack on students
03:23 - Demands from students
03:48 - Why is the review dangerous?
04:35 - Is the review a performative act?
05:11 - How would a tuition increase impact students and the province?
07:02 - Key takeaways
PROTECT STUDENTS | BC Students stand together against tuition increases, mergers and dangerous cuts
Subscribe
What even is a Zine? Mia shows us a behind the scene of how this little publication comes together, the vision behind it, and how to become a paid contributor of the C.C. Crumb!
Indigenous power means something different to every student, but it always begins with voice, community, and truth. Hear what CapU students had to say.
What does campus clean-up day look like?
© 2026 Capilano Courier | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme