Skip to content
Capilano Courier
Menu
  • Home
  • Sections
    • News
    • Features & The Profile
    • Arts & Culture
    • Letters
    • Humour
    • Video Production
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
  • Meet the Crew
  • Online Issues
  • Events
Menu

CMNS 236 Understanding More Television: The End of Television

Posted on March 25, 2019March 24, 2019 by Carlo Javier

Carlo Javier // The Only Exception 

Illustration by Coralie Mayer

The most on-brand ending Game of Thrones could possibly run would have to include the Night King and his Army of the Dead lay waste to the Westerosi civilizations and drive our surviving heroes past the Narrow Sea. 

A victory for the bad guys would follow the long-established ethos of Thrones – one that eschewed conventional narrative tropes, such as good triumphing over evil. Plus, if we were to accept internet readings that claim Thrones is a commentary on modern socio-political issues such as climate change, political polarization or general apathy, then what better way to end than to have evil triumphing over good. It would just seem ‘on-brand.’ In the wise words of the red priestess Melisandre, “There is only one hell, princess. The one we live in now.”

The end of Thrones will come later this spring. It will undoubtedly be contentious, as devotees of George R.R. Martin’s yet-to-be-finished A Song of Ice and Fire series will certainly have their gripes. Even show-first fans like me will likely have complaints, since loose ends and unanswered questions are inevitable. 

But more important than how Thrones concludes, is the very fact that it’s ending. Thrones, as The Ringer’s Alison Herman said, “is the very last piece of television monoculture.” It is the biggest television program of the post-Sopranos era, and likely has a claim as the biggest show ever. It is certainly the most expensive to produce, and as we found out last year, the most pirated. When Game of Thrones ends, it will take with it, the last bastion of linear television. 

Linear television refers to the broadcasting structure that programs traditionally follow. For example, Thrones airs on Sundays at 6 pm, Grey’s Anatomy is on Thursdays at 8 pm, and The Bachelor is on Mondays at 8 pm According to television scholar, Nele Simons, linear television isn’t just a mere broadcasting construct, it also paves the way for a social experience. A set-broadcasting schedule allows millions and millions of people to watch the same content, at the same time. Furthermore, the shared experience can also extend after the show, as evidenced by commentary, critique and conversation that we conduct about our favourite shows among friends and co-viewers. 

Thrones’ place in the pantheon of television greats is indisputable. It’s among the most watched shows in history, it’s the most pirated, and it’s the most expensive. Unlike other television titans like The Big Bang Theory (finally ending, whew), and Grey’s Anatomy (needs to end), Thrones remains in heavy demand despite the extra cost that its premium cable channel asks for.  

The most powerful weapon in any television show’s arsenal is the ending. It offers the long-awaited pay out to the seasons and seasons we invest in not only as viewers, but also as active participants in the culture around it, in discussions and critique. The end of Thrones comes at a time when we – active agents in the communications dialogue between producer and consumer – have displayed some semblance of power in effecting change in the process of content creation and production. Our very habits are the data that feeds Netflix’s infamous algorithm after all. Thrones stood tall amidst the rise of streaming, and once it concludes, there will be a massive vacant space in the television landscape.  

It’s fair to ask who will fill the crater that Thrones will leave. HBO’s Westworld exhibited tremendous promise in its first two seasons, and the cable company also has its highly-anticipated rendition of Watchmen in the works. Netflix isn’t going away, and Disney, Warner Media, and even Facebook are looking to secure some of that streaming revenue with their own platforms launching in the near future. Maybe we shouldn’t be looking for the next vanguard of linear television. Maybe the question to ask is whether or not we even need one. The streaming format has given us a seemingly endless library of television content to watch at our own leisure. More importantly, it’s given us control. We can now dictate what show we’ll watch, when we’ll watch it, where and how we’ll watch it. After all, the medium is and will always be the message.  

Category: Columns

Post navigation

← Global Narratives: Unexpected Lessons
Conspiracy Corner: A New World Order →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upcoming Tabling Hours: Thursdays, 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., at either the Learning Commons entrance (LB 126) or Birch Cafeteria.

Latest News

  • The Collateral Damage of Cutting Courses
    As CapU faces financial woes, students are being forced to take required courses elsewhere  Ben Taylor (he/him) // Crew Writer   Jasmine […]
  • Deficit Mitigation Proposals Meet Outdated Policies
    The key policy grey areas impacting Senate’s role in high-stakes decisions Laura Morales Padilla (she/her) // Co-EIC & Ilustrator  The […]
  • CapU Introduces Protest Guidelines
    Capilano University quietly introduces guidelines for protests on campus, emphasizes campus grounds are ‘private property’  Jolee Wen […]
  • CapU Announces the Closure of Sunshine Coast Kálax̱-ay Campus and the ‘not closure’ of CapU Lonsdale
    Administration consolidates two key satellite campuses as financial woes continue  Ren Zhang (they/they)  // Contributor & […]
  • Major Win for CapU Student Workers   
    New Student Employee Union Gets Wage Increase  Mayumi Izumi (she/her) // Contributor Rachel Lu (She/Her) // Illustrator Organizers at […]
  • Orange Pilled
    Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s Bitcoin Obsession   Ben Taylor (He/Him) // Crew Writer   Alex Baidanuta (She/Her) // Illustrator    […]
Video Production
On Monday, January 19th, BC student leaders held a press conference outside the Constituency Office of Jessie Sunner—Minister of Post-Secondary Education & Future Skills and MLA for Surrey-Newton. 

Kevin Root—Chairperson of the Alliance of BC Students, Solomon Yi-Kieran—Vice-President External of the UBC Alma Mater Society, and Jessica Lamb—VP External & Community Affairs of the Simon Fraser Student Society commented on the government's review of the post-secondary education sector and their experience during the "incredibly short" consultation period.

00:00 - Intro
00:18 - What happened on January 19th?
00:52 - Opening remarks by the Chairperson of the ABCS
01:02 - Why the federal cap on international students heavily impacted colleges and universities across the province.
01:47 - The government needs to pay their fair share of the operating costs to keep the system afloat
02:49 - Any changes to the tuition limit policy would be a direct attack on students
03:23 - Demands from students
03:48 - Why is the review dangerous?
04:35 - Is the review a performative act?
05:11 - How would a tuition increase impact students and the province?
07:02 - Key takeaways
PROTECT STUDENTS | BC Students stand together against tuition increases, mergers and dangerous cuts
Subscribe
What even is a Zine? Mia shows us a behind the scene of how this little publication comes together, the vision behind it, and how to become a paid contributor of the C.C. Crumb!
Indigenous power means something different to every student, but it always begins with voice, community, and truth. Hear what CapU students had to say.
What does campus clean-up day look like?
© 2026 Capilano Courier | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme