Skip to content
Capilano Courier
Menu
  • Home
  • Sections
    • News
    • Features & The Profile
    • Arts & Culture
    • Letters
    • Humour
    • Video Production
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Contribute
  • Meet the Crew
  • Online Issues
  • Events
Menu

Airbnb: A Dream and a Nightmare

Posted on October 9, 2018October 5, 2018 by Rachel D'Sa

How the home-sharing app is both good and bad for travelers and owners

Rachel D’Sa // Columns Editor

In April of this year, Vancouver cracked down on Airbnbs, transforming it for the better for its users. The city put in place new regulations ultimately putting a ban on non-principal residences being used as short-term rental houses and apartments. The city now also requires everyone short-term leasing principal residences to pay an annual $49 business licensing fee, in addition to a $54 activation fee.

These regulations were put into place upon the discovery of many illegal short-term listings across home-sharing sites, including Airbnb. The service is notorious for its easy-to-use, easy-to-access process, making it a breeze to find vacation homes all year round, even on short notice. In turn, many property owners have been taking advantage of desperate travelers in need of a place to rest their heads.

The regulations, while addressing smaller issues, work towards mending a much larger-scale problem. In an effort to alleviate the housing crisis, the new policies ultimately ban full-time short-term rentals in otherwise empty houses, and free up high-demand living spaces for those looking to be in Vancouver for the long haul. No longer are frantic apartment-seekers competing with the nightly rates of short-term stays.

While the regulations are unfortunate for those who are dependent on their Airbnb income, they instill a standard, which should have been in place to begin with. By treating Airbnb’s like the businesses they are, requiring them to file additional taxes, annually renew a business license and pay into the Canadian Pension Plan, the service is no longer a “casual” way to make money. While there are many listings for secure, clean and downright gorgeous spaces, there are just as many listings that put customers in atrocious living situations. Forcing users to go through additional “screening”, weeds out the good from the bad, helping protect customers from experiencing a night in a closet or a night in a hostel bunking with a dozen strangers.

This summer I stayed in a total of five Airbnbs over the course of three weeks. While my overall experience wasn’t traumatizing, it did made me reconsider booking through the service again. My cheapest Airbnb, located in Montreal, turned out to be the best out of the bunch. Toronto was a cubicle, despite the spacious-looking photos I had viewed prior to booking. New York was a nightmare, covered in a thick layer of dust, a roach infestation, no WiFi and black mould – not to mention that two out of three hosts attempted to scam me. Do a quick search for online articles trashing the company’s customer service, and you’ll easily pull up thousands of results. Though the service worked with me to “compensate” for the issues with one of my NY stays, when more troublesome problems arose out of another listing, I received no help whatsoever, despite my desperation for a safe place to stay. At the time of urgency, my cases were closed, without any help or reassurance given. These issues could have been easily avoided if the screening process was a lot more thorough.

Additionally, upon arrival to all of my destinations I was greeted with polite reminders from the hosts requesting that I be discreet with my presence in the buildings. Hosts currently continue to slide by, asking for their customers to say they are “visiting a friend” in order to avoid confrontation with neighbours and stratas. With massive amounts of strangers coming in and out of the buildings, leading to shared passwords and keys, it’s no surprise that home-sharing services pose a security threat.

While the new regulations work towards fixing these ongoing issues in Vancouver, they are still not applicable to most Vancouverites who are looking to venture out into the vacation abyss. Unfortunately, in the meantime, while we are waiting for the regulations to spread to other areas of the world, we’ll continue to be faced with disgust and disappointment.

Category: Opinions

Post navigation

← Fifty and Proud of It
Contemplating Consent →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upcoming Tabling Hours: Thursdays, 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., at either the Learning Commons entrance (LB 126) or Birch Cafeteria.

Latest News

  • The Collateral Damage of Cutting Courses
    As CapU faces financial woes, students are being forced to take required courses elsewhere  Ben Taylor (he/him) // Crew Writer   Jasmine […]
  • Deficit Mitigation Proposals Meet Outdated Policies
    The key policy grey areas impacting Senate’s role in high-stakes decisions Laura Morales Padilla (she/her) // Co-EIC & Ilustrator  The […]
  • CapU Introduces Protest Guidelines
    Capilano University quietly introduces guidelines for protests on campus, emphasizes campus grounds are ‘private property’  Jolee Wen […]
  • CapU Announces the Closure of Sunshine Coast Kálax̱-ay Campus and the ‘not closure’ of CapU Lonsdale
    Administration consolidates two key satellite campuses as financial woes continue  Ren Zhang (they/they)  // Contributor & […]
  • Major Win for CapU Student Workers   
    New Student Employee Union Gets Wage Increase  Mayumi Izumi (she/her) // Contributor Rachel Lu (She/Her) // Illustrator Organizers at […]
  • Orange Pilled
    Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s Bitcoin Obsession   Ben Taylor (He/Him) // Crew Writer   Alex Baidanuta (She/Her) // Illustrator    […]
Video Production
On Monday, January 19th, BC student leaders held a press conference outside the Constituency Office of Jessie Sunner—Minister of Post-Secondary Education & Future Skills and MLA for Surrey-Newton. 

Kevin Root—Chairperson of the Alliance of BC Students, Solomon Yi-Kieran—Vice-President External of the UBC Alma Mater Society, and Jessica Lamb—VP External & Community Affairs of the Simon Fraser Student Society commented on the government's review of the post-secondary education sector and their experience during the "incredibly short" consultation period.

00:00 - Intro
00:18 - What happened on January 19th?
00:52 - Opening remarks by the Chairperson of the ABCS
01:02 - Why the federal cap on international students heavily impacted colleges and universities across the province.
01:47 - The government needs to pay their fair share of the operating costs to keep the system afloat
02:49 - Any changes to the tuition limit policy would be a direct attack on students
03:23 - Demands from students
03:48 - Why is the review dangerous?
04:35 - Is the review a performative act?
05:11 - How would a tuition increase impact students and the province?
07:02 - Key takeaways
PROTECT STUDENTS | BC Students stand together against tuition increases, mergers and dangerous cuts
Subscribe
What even is a Zine? Mia shows us a behind the scene of how this little publication comes together, the vision behind it, and how to become a paid contributor of the C.C. Crumb!
Indigenous power means something different to every student, but it always begins with voice, community, and truth. Hear what CapU students had to say.
What does campus clean-up day look like?
© 2026 Capilano Courier | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme